Why? Where do you draw that line? Don't say stuff you wouldn't want others to say because it might be overheard? Don't think things you don't want others to know because your facial expression might give you away?
Eh, sorry, what? I'm not the one afraid what strangers might see. I don't think it's Lum's responsibility to make sure outsiders don't see us as fools is all I'm saying.
Blasphemy. As far as I can tell that's the one and only feature that doesn't seem to work right, so I'll continue to put up with it. Please don't take the theme away or anything, it's the only good one.
You have to operate under the assumption that absolutely everything you say anywhere on the internet can and will find its way to your spouse, parents, parole officer, neighbors, religious community, and newspaper. Because, when it comes down to it, it can and, if someone cares enough, it will.
And as I said, why do you draw the line at Internet? That assumption is equally valid for everything. You cannot operate at that point. Stopping the line at Internet might help you lead a life, but it is entirely arbitrary. It's a less extreme version of those sci-fi shorts where bad shit has happened and suddenly all science is bad. When something on the Internet leaks you should look at why it happened and learn from that. The "don't post shit you don't want public on the Internet" lesson is primarily coming from embarrassing Facebook stories, and it's entirely the wrong lesson to learn.
No, it's not. The internet has the distinct qualities of being globally accessible and relatively permanent.
Do you not bank online? Do you not put private information in e-mails? Do you send only public information via IMs? Do you never Skype? The Internet is global and public, information on the Internet is not. It depends entirely on the service. It's like saying all conversations are public, while ignoring the volume and location the conversation is held at.
I'll give you that one. I don't put information in emails that would be devastating to me if it somehow got out, no. I don't send such information via IMs, either. I use Skype but, again, don't use it to transfer any information that might be compromising. And even then, Skype calls are not permanent unless one of the involved parties actively records it, and that's much harder to do with a Skype call than with IM. Posts to internet message boards, public or private, are effectively permanent until the server dies, but even then you have things like the Internet Archive and Google Cache that may have copies. Emails are effectively permanent unless you personally own the physical servers and erase them yourself, but hardly anybody owns their own email servers now. The vast majority of emails will, on one end or another, be stored on servers owned by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, or Amazon, in which case you have to assume they're effectively engraved in stone.
Okay, if you can somehow construct a scenario where you personally own all the machines that the information will be going through and have a method to prevent outside access then, yes, you can transfer information over encrypted tunnels between your machines.
Asymmetric crypto's been around for a while. If I were sending emails I didn't want read or indexed by Google, I'd just encrypt them using something like Enigmail. Just sayin'! :)
-----BEGIN PGP----- iQA/AwUBOT1mCD37zva3hQYNEQKpFACg62jlF2AAoP9W bw/TYGu1+jfpnSwL3xBtSdeF =zUWs 8ujJKL8-u7JOIP786rfgJHGFFGgfG689//Gfgj6gfHJKUGKHJk7yf-09iup;pkklL:KJHkjYHU -----END PGP-----
Yeah, that background transparency issue is probably so messed up that even Elyscape couldn't fix it :(
So your information is public unless you own all the machines? So you don't mind posting your bank statements here? Of course you do, because the "it's all public!" argument is complete tosh. There's all sorts of information online you wouldn't want public, which is why it's secured behind logins, encrypted tunnels, DMZs, firewalls, etc. Your computer is on the Internet. Do you keep no personal information on it?
I just don't get why it matters either way. The bar you're suggesting be put in place isn't exactly a high one. What's wrong with letting any random passerby know that we're drama loving assholes? Especially when an extra 30 seconds of doing an account registration will allow them to see the same thing. Anyway, I added it to the list for the Great and Powerful Lum to consider.
Also, holy shit I need to go through and update the list. A bunch of stuff was either done or the requests are now silly (all the social forum stuff can be ignored since Lum has basically given up on it). Sometime this week maybe.
As of this morning social forums are no longer visible to people who aren't logged in, and the watch thread alerts work now. Thank you, Lum!
But when I'm logged in, I can read all the threads including the ones from groups I haven't joined. eta: And I can post in them too.
let me see if I can fix that Edit: nope, can't. Unfortunately it looks like setting a user to be unable to see the content of groups they are not members in also keeps them from actually seeing the entire group at all, thus preventing anyone from ever joining a group.
Is there any way to prevent an individual thread from showing up in the what's new list? I would often like to exclude specific let's plays that I'm not interested in for example, but not the entire forum.
May I have my own subforum to moderate? I think a private subforum wherein I won't post anything nor grant anyone else access would be perfect. It could be titled "I Have Nothing to Say and I am Saying It and That is Poetry As I Need It."
When I edit a post, if the post ends with italics or strikethrough, I can't press Enter for a new line. It's easy to work around, but I just thought it would be worth mentioning here, in case there's an easy fix.
If there is some update out there for the tweet embedding, please. My abuse of it with the Iron Sheik Tweet of the Day thread has pushed it to the limit.
Is it possible to set polls as editable? I'm actually doing something of an honest Let's Play with Battle of Britain 2, but it's harder here because I can't edit the poll (to change the question and options and to reset the vote totals) like I can at Bay12.
Someone is not taking advantage of the like-farming opportunity the inflexible polling system offers.
I'm afraid your point has soared far over my head. I'm but a neophyte when it comes to like-farming—I mean, not even Elyscape likes my wargame and simulator LPs. :P
Write a post for each poll option. Tell people to vote by liking the post corresponding to the preferred option.
please underline the links. i can just barely distinguish the blue color from normal text. this problem will not improve as i age.